Screener
TINT vs SMN
ProShares Smart Materials ETF vs ProShares UltraShort Materials
Key differences
- TINT costs 0.37% less per year.
- TINT follows a index tracking strategy; SMN uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, TINT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SMN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TINT | SMN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $3M |
| Since | 2021 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.03% | 4.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +50.2% | -31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.6% | -16.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -14.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.42 | -0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.73% | 34.14% |
| Max drawdown | -41.29% | -95.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TINT and SMN
Explore further