Screener
TUG vs FDAT
STF Tactical Growth ETF vs Tactical Advantage ETF
Key differences
- TUG costs 0.13% less per year.
- TUG is classified as mixed asset, while FDAT is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- TUG follows a active selection strategy; FDAT uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, TUG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TUG | FDAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $35M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | 5.68% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.8% | +12.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.6% | +8.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | 0.57 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.24% | 9.95% |
| Max drawdown | -22.27% | -8.20% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TUG and FDAT
Explore further