Screener
TUG vs LGH
STF Tactical Growth ETF vs HCM Defender 500 Index ETF
Key differences
- TUG costs 0.35% less per year.
- LGH is significantly larger than TUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TUG is classified as mixed asset, while LGH is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- TUG follows a active selection strategy; LGH uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, TUG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TUG | LGH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $555M |
| Since | 2022 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.4% | +27.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.5% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.15% | 15.64% |
| Max drawdown | -22.27% | -29.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TUG and LGH
Explore further