Screener
TUGN vs FDAT
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF vs Tactical Advantage ETF
Key differences
- TUGN costs 0.13% less per year.
- TUGN follows a option income strategy; FDAT uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, TUGN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TUGN | FDAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $78M | $35M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 11.46% | 5.68% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.7% | +12.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.1% | +8.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | 0.57 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.38% | 9.95% |
| Max drawdown | -23.45% | -8.20% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TUGN and FDAT
Explore further