Screener
TWM vs URTY
ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 vs ProShares UltraPro Russell2000
Key differences
- URTY is significantly larger than TWM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TWM follows a inverse strategy; URTY uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, URTY has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TWM | URTY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $47M | $347M |
| Since | 2007 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 5.86% | 0.70% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -52.8% | +146.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | -31.2% | +32.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -18.9% | -3.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.75 | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 38.52% | 57.65% |
| Max drawdown | -96.59% | -88.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TWM and URTY
Explore further