Screener
URA vs URNJ
Global X Uranium ETF vs Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
Key differences
- URA costs 0.11% less per year.
- URA is significantly larger than URNJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, URA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- URA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| URA | URNJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.8B | $454M |
| Since | 2010 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 3.75% | 5.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +65.1% | +64.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +41.8% | +28.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +23.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 0.66 |
| Volatility 1Y | 49.70% | 61.22% |
| Max drawdown | -61.45% | -59.21% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URA and URNJ
Explore further