Screener
URA vs URNM
Global X Uranium ETF vs Sprott Uranium Miners Etf
Key differences
- URA costs 0.06% less per year.
- URA is significantly larger than URNM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, URA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- URA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| URA | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.8B | $2.4B |
| Since | 2010 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 3.75% | 2.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +81.7% | +63.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +40.8% | +27.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.5% | +15.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 50.83% | 52.23% |
| Max drawdown | -61.45% | -50.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URA and URNM
Explore further