Screener
URA vs NLR
Global X Uranium ETF vs VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
Key differences
- NLR costs 0.17% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, URA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| URA | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.8B | $5.1B |
| Since | 2010 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 3.75% | 2.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +81.7% | +53.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +40.8% | +35.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.5% | +21.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 50.83% | 42.97% |
| Max drawdown | -61.45% | -34.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URA and NLR
Explore further