Screener
URA vs UX
Global X Uranium ETF vs Roundhill Uranium ETF
Key differences
- URA costs 0.08% less per year.
- URA is significantly larger than UX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- URA is classified as equity, while UX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- URA follows a index tracking strategy; UX uses multi strategy.
- URA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| URA | UX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.77% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.8B | $4M |
| Since | 2010 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.75% | 1.39% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +65.1% | +12.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +41.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +23.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 49.70% | 34.58% |
| Max drawdown | -61.45% | -23.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URA and UX
Explore further