Screener
URNJ vs URA
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF vs Global X Uranium ETF
Key differences
- URA costs 0.11% less per year.
- URA is significantly larger than URNJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, URA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- URA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| URNJ | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $454M | $7.8B |
| Since | 2023 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 5.38% | 3.75% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +64.2% | +65.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.2% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +23.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.66 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 61.22% | 49.70% |
| Max drawdown | -59.21% | -61.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URNJ and URA
Explore further