Screener
URNM vs UX
Sprott Uranium Miners Etf vs Roundhill Uranium ETF
Key differences
- URNM is significantly larger than UX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- URNM is classified as equity, while UX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- URNM follows a index tracking strategy; UX uses multi strategy.
- URNM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| URNM | UX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.77% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.4B | $4M |
| Since | 2019 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.58% | 1.39% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +52.1% | +12.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +29.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 51.03% | 34.58% |
| Max drawdown | -50.78% | -23.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URNM and UX
Explore further