Screener
UX vs NLR
Roundhill Uranium ETF vs VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
Key differences
- NLR costs 0.25% less per year.
- NLR is significantly larger than UX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- UX is classified as alternative, while NLR is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- UX follows a multi strategy strategy; NLR uses index tracking.
- NLR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| UX | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.77% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $5.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.39% | 2.19% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.2% | +53.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +35.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +21.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 35.64% | 42.97% |
| Max drawdown | -23.72% | -34.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UX and NLR
Explore further