Screener
UX vs URA
Roundhill Uranium ETF vs Global X Uranium ETF
Key differences
- URA costs 0.08% less per year.
- URA is significantly larger than UX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- UX is classified as alternative, while URA is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- UX follows a multi strategy strategy; URA uses index tracking.
- URA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| UX | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.77% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $7.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 1.39% | 3.75% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.6% | +65.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +41.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +23.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.58% | 49.70% |
| Max drawdown | -23.72% | -61.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UX and URA
Explore further