Screener
UYM vs IYM
ProShares Ultra Materials vs iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF
Key differences
- IYM costs 0.57% less per year.
- IYM is significantly larger than UYM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- UYM follows a leveraged strategy; IYM uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IYM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IYM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| UYM | IYM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $41M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2007 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.21% | 1.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.7% | +40.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.6% | +15.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.9% | +8.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.41 | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | 33.86% | 18.73% |
| Max drawdown | -73.31% | -42.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UYM and IYM
Explore further