Screener
VPL vs ADVE
Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund vs Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF
Key differences
- VPL costs 0.72% less per year.
- VPL is significantly larger than ADVE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VPL follows a index tracking strategy; ADVE uses active selection.
- VPL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VPL | ADVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.1B | $9M |
| Since | 2001 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.99% | 2.60% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +49.9% | +38.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.41% | 16.71% |
| Max drawdown | -33.89% | -18.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VPL and ADVE
Explore further