Screener
VPL vs ADIV
Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund vs Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF
Key differences
- VPL costs 0.71% less per year.
- VPL is significantly larger than ADIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VPL follows a index tracking strategy; ADIV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, VPL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- VPL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VPL | ADIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.1B | $55M |
| Since | 2001 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 2.99% | 2.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +49.9% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.5% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.41% | 13.26% |
| Max drawdown | -33.89% | -31.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VPL and ADIV
Explore further