Screener
VPL vs DVYA
Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund vs iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF
Key differences
- VPL costs 0.42% less per year.
- VPL is significantly larger than DVYA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VPL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VPL | DVYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.1B | $70M |
| Since | 2001 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.99% | 4.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +49.9% | +41.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.5% | +21.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | +10.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.41% | 13.00% |
| Max drawdown | -33.89% | -45.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VPL and DVYA
Explore further