Screener
VPL vs ASIA
Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund vs Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF
Key differences
- VPL costs 0.72% less per year.
- VPL is significantly larger than ASIA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VPL follows a index tracking strategy; ASIA uses active selection.
- VPL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VPL | ASIA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.1B | $50M |
| Since | 2001 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.99% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +49.9% | +55.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.41% | 20.89% |
| Max drawdown | -33.89% | -23.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VPL and ASIA
Explore further