Screener
VRAI vs PFIG
Virtus Real Asset Income ETF vs Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- PFIG costs 0.33% less per year.
- PFIG is significantly larger than VRAI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VRAI is classified as equity, while PFIG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, VRAI has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PFIG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VRAI | PFIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.22% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $18M | $113M |
| Since | 2019 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 3.19% | 4.37% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.9% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.0% | +1.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | 0.40 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.93% | 3.09% |
| Max drawdown | -47.51% | -15.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VRAI and PFIG
Explore further