Screener
VRIG vs PGHY
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF vs Invesco Global ex-US High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- VRIG is significantly larger than PGHY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VRIG follows a active selection strategy; PGHY uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, PGHY has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| VRIG | PGHY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $212M |
| Since | 2016 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 4.86% | 7.09% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.0% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.1% | +9.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.4% | +4.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.92 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.50% | 4.98% |
| Max drawdown | -13.04% | -20.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VRIG and PGHY
Explore further