Screener
XCEM vs RECS
Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Key differences
- RECS is significantly larger than XCEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XCEM covers emerging markets markets; RECS covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, XCEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XCEM | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.16% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $5.4B |
| Since | 2015 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 2.71% | 0.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +67.6% | +27.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.6% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.8% | +14.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.78% | 11.92% |
| Max drawdown | -40.92% | -34.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XCEM and RECS
Explore further