Skip to content
Screener

XLG vs EQWL

Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF vs Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF

XLG

Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$11.1B

EQWL

Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF

Annual cost

0.25%

Fund size

$2.6B

Key differences

Both XLG and EQWL are equity ETFs. XLG charges 0.20% a year and EQWL 0.25%. The main difference: XLG follows a index tracking strategy; EQWL uses index enhanced.

  • XLG follows a index tracking strategy; EQWL uses index enhanced.
  • XLG is much larger than EQWL. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, XLG has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

XLGEQWL
Annual cost (TER)0.20%0.25%
Fund size (AUM)$11.1B$2.6B
Since20052006
Dividend yield0.59%1.53%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex enhanced
CAGR 1Y+22.3%+21.1%
CAGR 3Y+23.4%+19.7%
CAGR 5Y+15.3%+11.7%
Sharpe 3Y1.121.17
Volatility 1Y13.70%10.74%
Max drawdown-30.46%-34.30%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all growth funds

Similar to XLG and EQWL