Screener
XNAV vs GAL
FundX Aggressive ETF vs State Street Global Allocation ETF
Key differences
- GAL costs 0.92% less per year.
- GAL is significantly larger than XNAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XNAV follows a active selection strategy; GAL uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XNAV | GAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.27% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $307M |
| Since | 2002 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | 3.18% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +44.5% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.0% | +14.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.54% | 8.75% |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -28.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XNAV and GAL
Explore further