Screener
CNYA vs EPP
iShares MSCI China A ETF vs iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF
Key differences
Both CNYA and EPP are equity ETFs. CNYA charges 0.60% a year and EPP 0.47%. The main difference: CNYA covers emerging markets; EPP covers global markets.
- CNYA covers emerging markets; EPP covers global markets.
- EPP costs 0.13% less per year.
- EPP is much larger than CNYA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EPP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EPP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CNYA | EPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $242M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2016 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 1.76% | 3.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.7% | +12.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | +13.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.9% | +4.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | 0.60 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.67% | 14.91% |
| Max drawdown | -49.48% | -39.30% |
Similar to CNYA and EPP
Explore further