Screener
ANEW vs ECNS
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF vs iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
Both ANEW and ECNS are equity ETFs. ANEW charges 0.45% a year and ECNS 0.59%. The main difference: ANEW costs 0.14% less per year.
- ANEW costs 0.14% less per year.
- ECNS is much larger than ANEW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, ANEW has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ECNS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANEW | ECNS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $71M |
| Since | 2020 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | 6.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.8% | +7.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.8% | +7.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | -7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.47% | 21.06% |
| Max drawdown | -39.87% | -63.44% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.