Screener
APUE vs MCH
ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF vs Matthews China Active ETF
Key differences
- APUE costs 0.48% less per year.
- APUE is significantly larger than MCH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- APUE covers north america markets; MCH covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, APUE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| APUE | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.31% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.4B | $22M |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.79% | 1.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.2% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.9% | +11.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.36% | 19.91% |
| Max drawdown | -18.83% | -40.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to APUE and MCH
Explore further