Screener
BBH vs LFEQ
VanEck Biotech ETF vs VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF
Key differences
- BBH costs 0.23% less per year.
- BBH is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BBH is classified as equity, while LFEQ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BBH follows a index tracking strategy; LFEQ uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, LFEQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BBH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BBH | LFEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $365M | $29M |
| Since | 2011 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.8% | +30.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.6% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.2% | +10.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.19 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.82% | 12.11% |
| Max drawdown | -39.86% | -35.19% |
Similar to BBH and LFEQ
Explore further