Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BBH vs LFEQ

VanEck Biotech ETF vs VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF

BBH

VanEck Biotech ETF

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$365M

LFEQ

VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF

Annual cost

0.58%

Fund size

$29M

Key differences

  • BBH costs 0.23% less per year.
  • BBH is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • BBH is classified as equity, while LFEQ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • BBH follows a index tracking strategy; LFEQ uses tactical allocation.
  • Over the last 3 years, LFEQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • BBH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

BBHLFEQ
Annual cost (TER)0.35%0.58%
Fund size (AUM)$365M$29M
Since20112017
Dividend yield0.52%0.86%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingtactical allocation
CAGR 1Y+26.8%+30.3%
CAGR 3Y+5.6%+18.9%
CAGR 5Y+1.2%+10.4%
Sharpe 3Y0.191.02
Volatility 1Y18.82%12.11%
Max drawdown-39.86%-35.19%

Similar to BBH and LFEQ