Screener
LFEQ vs PPH
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF
Key differences
- PPH costs 0.22% less per year.
- PPH is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ is classified as alternative, while PPH is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; PPH uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, LFEQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PPH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | PPH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $966M |
| Since | 2017 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 2.12% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +12.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | +9.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 0.61 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 17.11% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -29.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and PPH
Explore further