Screener
CMBS vs MTBA
iShares CMBS ETF vs Simplify MBS ETF
Key differences
- MTBA costs 0.10% less per year.
- MTBA is significantly larger than CMBS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CMBS is classified as fixed income, while MTBA is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- CMBS follows a index tracking strategy; MTBA uses multi strategy.
- CMBS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CMBS | MTBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $481M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2012 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 3.52% | 5.53% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.30 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.64% | 3.11% |
| Max drawdown | -15.87% | -3.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CMBS and MTBA
Explore further