Screener
MTBA vs OWNS
Simplify MBS ETF vs Impact Shares Affordable Housing MBS ETF
Key differences
- MTBA costs 0.15% less per year.
- MTBA is significantly larger than OWNS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MTBA is classified as alternative, while OWNS is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- MTBA follows a multi strategy strategy; OWNS uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| MTBA | OWNS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $102M |
| Since | 2023 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 5.53% | 4.31% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +7.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.11% | 4.57% |
| Max drawdown | -3.48% | -17.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MTBA and OWNS
Explore further