Screener
CNYA vs AAXJ
iShares MSCI China A ETF vs iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
Both CNYA and AAXJ are equity ETFs. CNYA charges 0.60% a year and AAXJ 0.72%. The main difference: CNYA covers emerging markets; AAXJ covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- CNYA covers emerging markets; AAXJ covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- CNYA costs 0.12% less per year.
- AAXJ is much larger than CNYA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, AAXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AAXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CNYA | AAXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $242M | $4.0B |
| Since | 2016 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.76% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.7% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | +22.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.9% | +5.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.67% | 21.53% |
| Max drawdown | -49.48% | -44.52% |
Similar to CNYA and AAXJ
Explore further