Screener
CNYA vs IPAC
iShares MSCI China A ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
Key differences
Both CNYA and IPAC are equity ETFs. CNYA charges 0.60% a year and IPAC 0.09%. The main difference: CNYA covers emerging markets; IPAC covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- CNYA covers emerging markets; IPAC covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- IPAC costs 0.51% less per year.
- IPAC is much larger than CNYA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IPAC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CNYA | IPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $242M | $2.6B |
| Since | 2016 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.76% | 3.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.7% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.9% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.67% | 16.74% |
| Max drawdown | -49.48% | -31.00% |
Similar to CNYA and IPAC
Explore further