Screener
GNR vs TURF
State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF vs T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- GNR is significantly larger than TURF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GNR follows a index tracking strategy; TURF uses active selection.
- GNR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GNR | TURF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.9B | $117M |
| Since | 2010 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.31% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.66 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.41% | — |
| Max drawdown | -48.59% | -6.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GNR and TURF
Explore further