Screener
EEMA vs EWA
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF vs iShares MSCI Australia ETF
Key differences
Both EEMA and EWA are equity ETFs. EEMA charges 0.49% a year and EWA 0.50%. The main difference: EEMA covers emerging markets; EWA covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- EEMA covers emerging markets; EWA covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- Over the last three years, EEMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EEMA | EWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $1.5B |
| Since | 2012 | 1996 |
| Dividend yield | 1.18% | 2.87% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.8% | +10.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.6% | +12.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.9% | +5.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 0.53 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.37% | 17.19% |
| Max drawdown | -44.18% | -45.54% |
Similar to EEMA and EWA
Explore further