Screener
EFA vs EFO
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF vs ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
Key differences
- EFA costs 0.63% less per year.
- EFA is significantly larger than EFO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFA covers global ex us markets; EFO covers europe.
- EFA follows a index tracking strategy; EFO uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, EFO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFA | EFO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75.6B | $30M |
| Since | 2001 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 3.17% | 1.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | europe |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.3% | +39.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.1% | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | +9.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.83 | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.16% | 30.85% |
| Max drawdown | -34.19% | -63.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFA and EFO
Explore further