Screener
EMM vs GEME
Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- EMM costs 0.09% less per year.
- GEME is significantly larger than EMM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMM | GEME | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $58M | $265M |
| Since | 2010 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.76% | 4.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +60.4% | +80.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.58% | 21.12% |
| Max drawdown | -21.99% | -16.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMM and GEME
Explore further