Screener
PCGG vs PCCE
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF vs Polen Capital China Growth ETF
Key differences
- PCGG costs 0.15% less per year.
- PCGG is significantly larger than PCCE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PCGG follows a active selection strategy; PCCE uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| PCGG | PCCE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $2M |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -5.5% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.33% | 18.79% |
| Max drawdown | -22.66% | -26.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PCGG and PCCE
Explore further