Screener
ESPO vs FFND
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF vs One Global ETF
Key differences
- ESPO costs 0.45% less per year.
- ESPO follows a index tracking strategy; FFND uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FFND has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ESPO | FFND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $257M | $99M |
| Since | 2018 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.7% | +23.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.07% | 12.97% |
| Max drawdown | -50.99% | -47.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ESPO and FFND
Explore further