Screener
ESPO vs ROBO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF vs Robo Global Robotics and Automation Index ETF
Key differences
- ESPO costs 0.40% less per year.
- ROBO is significantly larger than ESPO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ESPO follows a index tracking strategy; ROBO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, ESPO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ROBO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ESPO | ROBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $257M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2018 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.7% | +60.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +17.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | +8.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.07% | 23.17% |
| Max drawdown | -50.99% | -43.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ESPO and ROBO
Explore further