Screener
EWT vs IPAC
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
Key differences
Both EWT and IPAC are equity ETFs. EWT charges 0.59% a year and IPAC 0.09%. The main difference: IPAC costs 0.50% less per year.
- IPAC costs 0.50% less per year.
- EWT is much larger than IPAC. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EWT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWT | IPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.8B | $2.6B |
| Since | 2000 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 3.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +90.1% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +37.2% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.3% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.29 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.22% | 16.74% |
| Max drawdown | -38.88% | -31.00% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.