Screener
FLAU vs EEMA
Franklin FTSE Australia ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Key differences
Both FLAU and EEMA are equity ETFs. FLAU charges 0.09% a year and EEMA 0.49%. The main difference: FLAU covers the Asia-Pacific region; EEMA covers emerging markets.
- FLAU covers the Asia-Pacific region; EEMA covers emerging markets.
- FLAU costs 0.40% less per year.
- EEMA is much larger than FLAU. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EEMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EEMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLAU | EEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $86M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2017 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.92% | 1.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.4% | +43.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.1% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.7% | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.56 | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.93% | 21.37% |
| Max drawdown | -45.73% | -44.18% |
Similar to FLAU and EEMA
Explore further