Screener
GPZ vs RAAX
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs VanEck Real Assets ETF
Key differences
- GPZ costs 0.29% less per year.
- RAAX is significantly larger than GPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GPZ is classified as equity, while RAAX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GPZ follows a index tracking strategy; RAAX uses active selection.
- RAAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPZ | RAAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $905M |
| Since | 2025 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.93% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +37.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.64% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -33.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GPZ and RAAX
Explore further