Screener
RAAX vs LFEQ
VanEck Real Assets ETF vs VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF
Key differences
- LFEQ costs 0.11% less per year.
- RAAX is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RAAX follows a active selection strategy; LFEQ uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, RAAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RAAX | LFEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $905M | $29M |
| Since | 2018 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.93% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.4% | +28.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.1% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.0% | +10.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.66% | 12.13% |
| Max drawdown | -33.91% | -35.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RAAX and LFEQ
Explore further