Screener
HFND vs QAI
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF vs NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF
Key differences
- QAI costs 0.19% less per year.
- QAI is significantly larger than HFND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QAI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HFND | QAI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.07% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $32M | $968M |
| Since | 2022 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 4.72% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.4% | +15.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.7% | +9.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.44% | 5.97% |
| Max drawdown | -13.31% | -14.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HFND and QAI
Explore further