Screener
IALT vs FMF
iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF vs First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund
Key differences
- IALT follows a systematic alpha strategy; FMF uses managed futures.
- FMF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IALT | FMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $210M | $266M |
| Since | 2025 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +21.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.41 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 9.65% |
| Max drawdown | -1.47% | -16.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IALT and FMF
Explore further