Screener
KEMQ vs KWEB
KraneShares FTSE Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF vs KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Key differences
- KEMQ costs 0.20% less per year.
- KWEB is significantly larger than KEMQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, KEMQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KEMQ | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.70% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $6.3B |
| Since | 2017 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 5.39% | 7.42% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.0% | -15.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.1% | +2.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -3.0% | -14.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | 0.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.64% | 26.80% |
| Max drawdown | -70.72% | -80.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KEMQ and KWEB
Explore further