Screener
KGRN vs KBA
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology ETF vs KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF
Key differences
- KBA costs 0.23% less per year.
- KBA is significantly larger than KGRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, KBA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KGRN | KBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.56% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $62M | $191M |
| Since | 2017 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.82% | 1.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -0.5% | +38.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +1.3% | +12.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.0% | +6.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.09 | 0.49 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.19% | 17.21% |
| Max drawdown | -66.37% | -45.32% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KGRN and KBA
Explore further