Screener
LFEQ vs GDX
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs VanEck Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- GDX costs 0.07% less per year.
- GDX is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ is classified as alternative, while GDX is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; GDX uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GDX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GDX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | GDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.51% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $27.3B |
| Since | 2017 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.72% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +70.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +40.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | +18.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 45.53% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -49.79% |
Similar to LFEQ and GDX
Explore further