Screener
LFEQ vs GDXJ
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- GDXJ costs 0.06% less per year.
- GDXJ is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ is classified as alternative, while GDXJ is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; GDXJ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GDXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GDXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | GDXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $8.7B |
| Since | 2017 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 2.27% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +78.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +45.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | +18.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 49.67% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -57.78% |
Similar to LFEQ and GDXJ
Explore further