Screener
LFEQ vs MOO
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs VanEck Agribusiness ETF
Key differences
LFEQ is an alternative ETF, while MOO is an equity ETF. LFEQ charges 0.58% a year and MOO 0.56%.
- LFEQ is an alternative fund, while MOO is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; MOO uses index tracking.
- MOO is much larger than LFEQ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, LFEQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- MOO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.56% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30M | $940M |
| Since | 2017 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.82% | 2.26% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.6% | +10.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | +3.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.6% | -0.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | 0.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.24% | 14.03% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -39.52% |
Similar to LFEQ and MOO
Explore further